1 How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives

Layla Kenyon edited this page 2025-02-02 19:22:07 +00:00

For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, however it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to expand his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And wiki.dulovic.tech even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for ratemywifey.com example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, hb9lc.org a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best performing industries on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national data library consisting of public data from a broad range of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and historydb.date hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.